Report on Grant Writing and Reviewing Workshop
The Grant Writing and Reviewing workshop took place on Wednesday 16th September and due to COVID-19 restrictions was undertaken on Zoom, with delegates linking in from several countries.
Mike Mendl (Network Lead) welcomed everyone to the meeting and then introduced Luke Williams from BBSRC, who described the purpose of the workshop and gave an overview of what to expect from the mock grant committee process. The mock grant committees are a key element of the workshop, designed to replicate the BBSRC grant selection process and give the delegates a clear picture of how grants are chosen for funding. 50 delegates had registered for the event, so we set up five committees which would each review 10 real animal welfare grants, giving each delegate the chance to lead on one grant. Each committee required a Chair and we were really fortunate that Keelin O'Driscoll, Rick D'Eath, Karen Spencer, John Tarlton and Dorothy McKeegan agreed to do this. They all have experience of sitting on BBSRC panels so were able to make the process as realistic as possible. In advance of the meeting the delegates each reviewed two of the grants following the BBSRC protocols and everyone on the Committee read as many of the ten grants as they could. Although this was a lot of work before the workshop had even started and they often underestimated how long it would take, many delegates commented on how worthwhile they felt this process was.
On the day, we set up a Zoom breakout room for each committee, where the Chairs and admin officers went through each of the ten grants, asking the two delegates that reviewed each grant to introduce it to the rest of the committee and then inviting general discussion. A score was agreed for each grant in turn and by the end of the 3 hours each committee was able to rank their grants in order of their scores. It was clear from the feedback that the delegates found this element of the workshop extremely useful and well worth the effort they had put in before the event.
The delegates then took a well-earned lunch break, before joining us on Zoom webinar for an afternoon of presentations and question and answer sessions. Luke Williams kicked this off by describing what has changed in BBSRC Committees since the reviewed grants were submitted (it was not possible to source grants from the most recent submission round) and how this might affect applications. He then gave a short presentation on "What makes a grant application successful", which was followed by a Q&A panel on the same topic with Luke, Keelin O'Driscoll, Rick D'Eath, Dorothy McKeegan and Carole Fureix. They answered an array of questions from the delegates, including how scores are adjusted for new investigators, whether letters of support make much difference and how the research councils being combined will affect the process.
We were then joined by John Tregoning from Imperial College London who gave an inspiring talk on how to deal with unsuccessful applications titled "Fail Better". John gave us an amusing insight into his career, discussed points at which he has wanted to quit, highlighted some of the positives about a career in research, discussed resilience and learning how to fail and reminded us that it is just a job and that we can change things if we want to. John finished by pointing us in the direction of some interesting reading materials to help us gain a positive mindset.
After a tea break the delegates returned for a final talk given by Jacqui Oakley (Research Development Manager at University of Bristol) on how the process differs with other funding bodies. Jacqui gave an excellent introduction covering different funding bodies and types of funding and giving everyone a summary of top tips for the review processes. This was followed by a Q&A panel on the subject with Jacqui, Luke, Huw Golledge (UFAW), Keelin O'Driscoll, Dorothy McKeegan and Rick D'Eath. They fielded questions on whether funding should be allocated randomly to grants meeting a certain quality, what it means if your application is pushed to the next panel meeting and whether other funding bodies provide feedback.
We had fantastic feedback from the delegates who particularly benefitted from the mock grant panels. We are grateful to all those who contributed their time to assist with the event, particularly Luke Williams and all the Chairs.
All the talks were either recorded or the slides made available and are being uploaded to the website, members will be able to log in and find them under Meeting Presentations.
Blog
Categories
Archive
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- August 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016